A 20-minute private interview.
Adaptive to your industry and your answers. It asks for proof, not opinion, because opinion is what every AI assessment already has.
Know where it pays at your property and where it would break first. No new software.
An open letter to CEOs who are about to spend on AI. Read the letter →
Everyone promises where AI pays. Nobody tells you where it will fail.
Where AI will pay. The single operating constraint that limits the property most, and the two or three levers around it where AI creates leverage. Not a list of tools.
What to prioritize. Ranked, with the reason for the rank.
What not to automate yet. The parts of the operation that are not structurally ready, and what has to be true first. This is the part most AI assessments skip, and the part that saves the most money.
What it is worth. A conservative dollar figure for each lever, built from a number you stated against a named benchmark. If you cannot state the number, the report says so instead of inventing one.
What to do in the next 90 days. A 30/60/90 leadership roadmap, and Session 1 on Zoom to walk it with you, included.
Adaptive to your industry and your answers. It asks for proof, not opinion, because opinion is what every AI assessment already has.
Web and PDF. Readiness score, constraint map, lever-by-lever economics, 90-day roadmap. Every dollar shows its source.
We walk the findings together. If the opportunity is real, the 90-Day Advisory works the plan with you. If it is not, you have the read you needed and you paid $1,995 for it.
Each dollar figure in the report is one of your stated numbers, multiplied against a benchmark we name, at a conservative capture rate we show. Where you cannot state the number, the report prints a visibility finding instead of a dollar. The figure is smaller than a consultant would show you. It is also one you can defend to an owner, a partner, or a lender.
Leadership sees guest activity and event volume, but cannot isolate where the first service or labor breakdown occurs.
Guest experience is being interpreted through satisfaction and activity instead of measurable operating readiness.
No single operating view proves whether service inconsistency is caused by staffing, handoffs, event planning, service recovery, or revenue leakage.
On Monday morning, compare staffing plans, event handoffs, service recovery logs, guest communication, revenue capture, and owner accountability.
Which guest journey, reservation, staffing, service recovery, or property-level workflow is creating the most operating pressure right now?
“Guest satisfaction is strong, but labor coordination and event execution still feel inconsistent.”
“Is the constraint staffing, handoff discipline, service recovery, event setup, guest communication, or revenue capture? What report would prove that by Monday morning?”
Describe the business context: number of locations or properties, event spaces or internal hospitality teams, leadership structure, customer segments, and the workflow that creates the most pressure.
Two properties, one leadership team across both, mostly leisure guests with a growing group business. The pressure is the front desk knowing what happened on the last shift.
Where do reservations, event inquiries, private dining, group requests, or internal hospitality requests lose momentum before they become owned work?
Event inquiries. They come in by email and phone, get acknowledged, and then sit until someone has time to price them.
What guest, client, visitor, or event context must survive across shifts, departments, locations, or future interactions?
Guest preferences and any service recovery. Right now that lives with whoever handled it.
It asks for proof, not opinion, because opinion is what every AI assessment already has.
Each figure comes from a number you stated, against a benchmark we name. Where you could not state one, the report says so.
Start with the diagnostic and decide after Session 1. Or start the Advisory now; the diagnostic is included.
A private adaptive interview, readiness score, opportunity model, operating constraint map, 90-day path, and executive report.
$1,995 One-time Executive DiagnosticThe diagnostic, then six working sessions over 90 days with the person who built it.
$14,950 Founding rate: $8,950 for the first five clients or through 31 Dec 2026, whichever comes first. The diagnostic is included.One number you stated, one benchmark we name, one capture rate we show. All three are printed next to the figure. If you cannot state the number, there is no figure.
No. It is an adaptive interview that asks for evidence. It changes based on what you say.
No. Twenty minutes and your own knowledge of the property.
You. Your answers generate your report and are not used to train public AI models.
Then the report says so, names what has to change first, and you have saved yourself from buying tools that would not have paid.
Session 1 on Zoom, included. Then, if the opportunity is real, the 90-Day Advisory. If not, you are done and you have the read.
About 20 minutes. Most people finish in one sitting.